Advertise on DISCO3.CO.UK
Forum · Gallery · Wiki · Shop · Sponsors
DISCO3.CO.UK > General

D3 vs Range Rover?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Pete K
 


Member Since: 15 Jan 2016
Location: GL
Posts: 10608

England 2005 Discovery 3 TDV6 HSE Auto Rimini RedDiscovery 3

SafariDave wrote:
The super charge 4.2 V8 seems to have issues.
Dave


Such as? I think they are more reliable than the diesels.
  
Post #179352619th Mar 2017 4:02 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geoffsnook
 


Member Since: 13 Jun 2014
Location: south wales
Posts: 3169

Wales 

i too thought there were less issues's with the V8 petrols as no turbo's and the cranks do not self destruct or am i wrong with that statement Thumbs Up
 Discovery 3 se gone
Range rover sport supercharged here:) 
 
Post #179353819th Mar 2017 4:42 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CMG
 


Member Since: 12 Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 956

United States 2007 LR3 4.4 V8 SE Auto Java BlackLR3

If getting a V8, do the Jag 4.4, but outside of that I'd look for what seems to be in the best condition. That's how I'd choose.
 17 Discovery 5 HSE Si6, Fuji White on brown | 07 LR3 SE 4.4 Java Black on Alpaca
Club V8/Club OCD
 
 
Post #179375020th Mar 2017 1:05 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
SafariDave
 


Member Since: 19 Nov 2011
Location: NYC & LA
Posts: 775

United States 2005 Discovery 3 4.4 V8 SE Auto Bonatti GreyDiscovery 3

geoffsnook wrote:
i too thought there were less issues's with the V8 petrols as no turbo's and the cranks do not self destruct or am i wrong with that statement Thumbs Up


Yes! The 4.4 V8 jag is the way to go in either a D3, RRS or FFRR. The 4.4 jag V8 engine is reliable, no crank issues.
Dave
 D3 2005 V8 SE Bonatti Grey "The Rhino" (our NYC D3)
De-tangoed Headlights, D4 2016 Style Black Pack Grille, D4 19" Wheels/ Bridgestone Alenza
D3 2005 V8 SE Bonatti Grey, D4 2016 Style Black Pack Grille (our LA D3)
D2 1999 V8 SD7 Chawton White (our Caribbean Beach truck) 
 
Post #179376920th Mar 2017 3:29 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
toolbox 28
 


Member Since: 27 Nov 2016
Location: lechlade, glos
Posts: 123

United Kingdom 2010 Discovery 4 3.0 TDV6 HSE Auto Stornoway GreyDiscovery 4

Got a d3 v8 4.4 jag with 152000 on the clock which has been pretty reliable, odd issue with throttle body and the normal bushes etc but if you can live with the mpg they're a great versatile vehicle.
 54 disco 3 4.4 v8 now gone
06 freelander hse now gone
98 disco 2td5 now working on the farm 
 
Post #179381320th Mar 2017 10:14 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pete K
 


Member Since: 15 Jan 2016
Location: GL
Posts: 10608

England 2005 Discovery 3 TDV6 HSE Auto Rimini RedDiscovery 3

The RRS 4.4 is a rare car though.

In RRS there are far more 4.2 SC available, very little in addition goes wrong, insignificant difference in fuel, but many more Very Happy per mile.
  
Post #179387820th Mar 2017 1:15 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRSTDV8
 


Member Since: 07 Apr 2014
Location: Here
Posts: 13407

United Kingdom 

SafariDave wrote:


Yes! The 4.4 V8 jag is the way to go in either a D3, RRS or FFRR. The 4.4 jag V8 engine is reliable, no crank issues.
Dave

For those of us living in high fuel tax areas e.g. the UK, the 4.4 petrol only makes sense if low annual mileage is driven. Sticking 20-30,000 miles a year under the wheels makes it a very unattractive engine.

If I was buying a FFRR it would have the 4.4 diesel V8.
 Visiting from rrsport.co.uk
2012 RRS SDV6
2008 RRS TDV8
"When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die! You don't know who's children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they were always going to have to do from the very beginning: SIT DOWN AND TALK!" 
 
Post #179388720th Mar 2017 1:32 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRSTDV8
 


Member Since: 07 Apr 2014
Location: Here
Posts: 13407

United Kingdom 

Pete K wrote:
The RRS 4.4 is a rare car though.

In RRS there are far more 4.2 SC available, very little in addition goes wrong, insignificant difference in fuel, but many more Very Happy per mile.

The RRS 4.4 is rare because it makes no sense. It uses as much fuel, basically, as the 4.2 but doesn't bring much performance to the table. Replacing it​ with the 3.6TDV8 was a sensible move by LR. The TDV8 is as quick, if not quicker, but gives 25%+ better fuel mileage.

Having said that, a 4.4 RRS G4 would be a nice second vehicle / plaything.
 Visiting from rrsport.co.uk
2012 RRS SDV6
2008 RRS TDV8
"When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die! You don't know who's children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they were always going to have to do from the very beginning: SIT DOWN AND TALK!" 
 
Post #179388820th Mar 2017 1:36 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geoffsnook
 


Member Since: 13 Jun 2014
Location: south wales
Posts: 3169

Wales 

When i researched my purchase i did not see that the fuel consumption was 25% better than the supercharged but a lot of people said about the fact of replacing the turbos and the inlet manifolds on the tdv8 were bloody expensive and mine was defiantly quicker than the tdv8 off the lights the other day Mr. Green
 Discovery 3 se gone
Range rover sport supercharged here:) 
 
Post #179392620th Mar 2017 3:04 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pete K
 


Member Since: 15 Jan 2016
Location: GL
Posts: 10608

England 2005 Discovery 3 TDV6 HSE Auto Rimini RedDiscovery 3

I think he meant the TDV8 was more economical and faster than the 4.4 petrol


TDV8 is nice as brand new car, but not so attractive to own at an 8 year old car
  
Post #179401320th Mar 2017 7:53 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
welldriven
 


Member Since: 15 Feb 2017
Location: Ely, Cambridgeshire
Posts: 113

United Kingdom 2007 Discovery 3 TDV6 HSE Auto Java BlackDiscovery 3

We used to have a 2004 L322 FFRR Vogue for a few years. Beautiful car to drive and be driven in but ours was one of those horror story ones. We kept it for what must have been 5 years but only because it wasn't the daily car.

Main issue was a battery drain that we never got to the bottom of even when we finally sold it. It had the headlight washers / wipers replaced, parking sensors replaced, a suspension fault at one point, gear box issues, central locking issues, an intermittent bi-xenon headlight issue... and probably more that I cannot remember off the top of my head. It was a 4.4 Petrol V8 that never saw more than 18mpg. On a plus note, it was nowhere near as bad as the P38 we had a few years before that...

If you can, i'd recommend a much newer TDV8 unless you are willing to spend a lot keeping an older one on the road. I thought about the same when I bought my D3, for once head beat heart and I stopped looking at RRs.
 2007 Black Discovery 3 HSE TDV6 - Fully loaded. Extended roof rails, EGR blanks, side steps, Grabber ATs.
2013 Red Fiat 500S - Completely standard... (the Mrs' car)
1991 BRG Eunos Roadster V-Spec - New project car 
 
Post #179472322nd Mar 2017 10:57 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Chawks
 


Member Since: 10 Aug 2016
Location: Dorset
Posts: 89

United Kingdom 

Thanks for the info and comments one and all. I'm thinking D3 is the way to go in terms of practicality over anything else
  
Post #179472922nd Mar 2017 11:24 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
speedymarktd6
 


Member Since: 30 Dec 2008
Location: midlands
Posts: 68

United Kingdom 

I have had a selection of LR vehicles over the years , I loved my td6 Range Rover vogue and I love my TDV8 Range Rover vogue

I love the discos but I'm always put off by eigher hearing of constant engine failures or constant gearbox failures

In a perfect world I'd have a disco 4 with a 3.6 / 4.4 TDV8 and 6 / 8 speed auto what a fantastic combination that would be
  
Post #179507222nd Mar 2017 11:59 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Display posts from the last:  
Post Reply Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
Jump to:  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >


Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



DISCO3.CO.UK Copyright © 2004-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DISCO3.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

DISCO3.CO.UK is independent and not affiliated to Land Rover.
Switch to Mobile Site