Advertise on DISCO3.CO.UK
Forum · Gallery · Wiki · Shop · Sponsors
DISCO3.CO.UK > Technical (D4)

Disco 2012 fuel consumption computer way out - sorted now
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
assmageden
 


Member Since: 28 Nov 2011
Location: North England
Posts: 15

United Kingdom 2012 Discovery 4 3.0 SDV6 XS Auto Sumatra BlackDiscovery 4
Disco 2012 fuel consumption computer way out - sorted now

Not sure if this is of use to anyone, but my disco 4, 8 speed, 3 litre, 2012 model shows 37 mpg on the trip.

thought i had dropped onto a miracle but then checked the tank to tank measure and the result was more like 30 mpg.

Had the car in today for new discs (3500 miles, 4 weeks old!) and asked them to look at the computer and see if it can be calibrated to be somewhere near fit for purpose.

Top dealer (duckworths) found the set up file for the car had not been populated with its tyre rim and sizes so the computer was on party time.

Inputed the tyre size etc, and the computer is much more acurate already. 32 mpg, and tank measure 31 mpg.

May be worth asking the question if you have similar issues. It is a big bus and burns fuel which I expect. I just like to how much now and again.
  
Post #8789875th Jan 2012 12:24 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
kljw
 


Member Since: 06 Aug 2011
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 185

Scotland 

assmageden
can we do this our selves? or do we need a gadget like faultmate or the like?
 Cheers
Keith 
 
Post #8809369th Jan 2012 9:34 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bodsy
Site Sponsor 


Member Since: 06 Nov 2006
Location: In the Clubhouse
Posts: 21361

United Kingdom 2007 Discovery 3 TDV6 HSE Auto Java BlackDiscovery 3

You'd need a faultmate type device. Thumbs Up
 Bodsys Brake Bible

D4/D3 Remote FBH heat kits
BAS Remaps/ EGR Blank
Transmission Flush
Software updates/enabling


Clock/ SNOTM /3Flash / 4x4Info /BT Update /Service Reset/Error Codes / Gearbox Reset
See It Here 
 
Post #8809409th Jan 2012 9:35 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
DSL
Keeper of the wheelie bin 


Member Since: 11 May 2006
Location: Off again! :-)
Posts: 73078

Ukraine 

Curious that it isn't a standard setting as 19", 18" & 17" (latter 2 when fitted to 2.7 models for other markets) are all same rolling circumference. I assume same for 20"ers, especially if that is fitted with te standard LR skinny margin saver spare. Any difference would be fraction of a percent, not 30% difference. Confused
   
Post #8809439th Jan 2012 9:41 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mzplcg
 


Member Since: 23 Jun 2009
Location: Gone
Posts: 1087

England 

Perhaps not having it populated defaults to some other measure which is a country mile away from where it should be. My understanding is that all of this CCF stuff is Ford based and thus used on a lot more than just JLR vehicles.

Whatever, I think having it populated with correct LR sizes would produce accurate-ish results no matter if on 18" 19" or 20". Put another way, those who choose to fit 22" as aftermarkets don't seem to mention getting the CCF file altered to match. But if the blank value corresponds to the wheel size on, say, a Ford F250.........that will be quite a lot larger I suspect.
  
Post #8810459th Jan 2012 1:24 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Display posts from the last:  
Post Reply Back to top
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >


Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



DISCO3.CO.UK Copyright © 2004-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DISCO3.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

DISCO3.CO.UK is independent and not affiliated to Land Rover.
Switch to Mobile Site