Member Since: 22 Sep 2011
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 423
We will all have to agree to disagree then
I know you can't sell DVDs on this site,and I agree with that, but I do not see the harm in posting links to other sites that give the members the choice of buying it if they wish . After all 2011 discs at superb prices, and before you say poor quality and they don't work they do I have been told
Last edited by Stuarts the man on 1st Feb 2012 6:26 pm. Edited 1 time in total
1st Feb 2012 6:13 pm
DG Site Moderator
Member Since: 12 Dec 2005
Location: The Gaff
Posts: 50978
On a programme I watched last night people didn't see the harm in looting either ...and there are some that don't see the harm in ordering illegally made number plates
Thanks for you opinion ......it was great while it lasted 21 year LR veteran > D2 GS 2003 > D3 S 2006 > D3 HSE 2009 > D4 HSE 2013 > D4 HSE 2015 > D5 HSE 2018 > DS HSE R-Dynamic P300e 2021
1st Feb 2012 6:28 pm
ruggedpeak
Member Since: 10 Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1625
I think the issue is that regardless of what view one takes, the site owner can get into trouble for promoting this stuff.
Most of the time nothing will happen but for all we know Navteq might suddenly get the raging hump and decide they've had enough of people stealing off them and get a firm of lawyers to start firing off cease and desist letters, or Land Rover get the hump etc etc.
I would guess Martin doesn't need the grief? I certainly wouldn't, and we've seen what a bunch of the record industry have been over piracy and nailing poor, innocent fluffy music thieves Tony
Club RLD Wheel Protector & Sump Guard
Club 4x4 Info activated
1st Feb 2012 6:30 pm
DSL Keeper of the wheelie bin
Member Since: 11 May 2006
Location: Off again! :-)
Posts: 73085
I don't see what all the fuss is over pirated nav discs, I can only use them as a coffee mug coaster. Ah the joys of a peasant level D3 & tomtom on the iDog&Bone.
Copies are not always as good quality as the original though!
1st Feb 2012 6:40 pm
GoatOfMendez
Member Since: 02 May 2009
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 92
A copied DVD is a bit for bit copy. It is an exact binary copy, digitally indistinguishable from the original.
If someone chose to spend ten of thousands to recreate the exact same functionality as the official sat nav DVD but from their own data, software and tools then that is not a bit for bit copy. It is a compatible part, but not a copy, and would be legal (assuming that any methods needed to create your own disc did not also infringe patent law).
As an example; in the early days of PCs IBM wrote the first BIOS. Compaq when making the first clone could not copy the IBM BIOS and resell it. A bit for bit copy would have been illegal. They had to fund and develop their own BIOS which recreated the exact same functionality but based upon their own source code (IP). It cost them a year and $1million to do it.
There is a key difference here between the usage so far of the word "copy".
1st Feb 2012 6:53 pm
ruggedpeak
Member Since: 10 Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1625
Stuarts the man wrote:
A copy is a copy surely, just because the lr logo has changed slightly it is still an infringement.
But the law around this is very clear, you can copy things as long as there are sufficient differences from the original to make it distinguishable. These do not have to be huge, or even noticeable to the untrained eye, and the extent and type of difference required is pretty clear from case law (see supermarkets with own brand products that look like real brands)
I haven't seen the flaps concerned (oo err) but as long Land Rover's IP is not being breached there is no issue legally. Whereas downloading unaltered code is illegal. So flaps OK, cracked satnav not.Tony
Club RLD Wheel Protector & Sump Guard
Club 4x4 Info activated
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum