|
|
Jads777
Member Since: 03 Sep 2005
Location: Channel Islands
Posts: 697
|
B@lls, I can't do URL's.
|
 10th Dec 2006 9:32 pm |
|
|
simon
Member Since: 11 Jan 2005
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 18296
  
|
worked Ok for me thanks.
|
| 10th Dec 2006 9:36 pm |
|
|
croyde
Member Since: 17 Aug 2005
Location: SE England
Posts: 459
|
Latest bloody bandwagon, effing CLIMATE CHANGE. Its what it does and has been doing for Aeons.
The planet has a climate which is continually changing. FULL STOP.
Man's contribution to it is infinitessimally minute and man's attempts to change it are doomed so come on lets enjoy ourselves.
Hang on I'm preaching to the converted here I'd better hop over to the Grim  site.
|
| 11th Dec 2006 12:31 am |
|
|
dlm3
Member Since: 24 Oct 2006
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 54
  
|
It's interesting that the supporters of Global Warming insist that human activity is responsible and their climate models 'prove it'. What they don't tell you is that in order for their climate models to show the desired result, they have to neglect the Little Ice Age of the 1700s that throws a kink in their data. (moreover, a rapidly diverging result is not uncommon if the model doesn't incorporate all the processes involved in a system.)
If they can't be honest about the one thing that is the primary basis for their gloomy predictions, why should anyone take them seriously?
In the mean time, I will continue driving my politically incorrect, CO2 belching, gas guzzling Land Rover as long as it suits me.
|
| 11th Dec 2006 3:29 am |
|
|
croyde
Member Since: 17 Aug 2005
Location: SE England
Posts: 459
|
The Voice of sense 
Unfortunately the thing that may stop me driving my gas guzzling LR is the amazingly high cost of fuel in the UK. Nearly $8 a gallon 
|
| 11th Dec 2006 12:05 pm |
|
|
|
|
Flying Brick
Member Since: 05 Nov 2006
Location: Madrid
Posts: 25
  
|
¿Mankind effects? Yet to be proved. PG'ed
|
| 11th Dec 2006 12:21 pm |
|
|
